The focus has been squarely on the Russians for the hacking of the dnc e-mails, even though they stated they hadn't done it. Do I think that they haven't hacked, continue to hack and won't stop trying to hack into US systems? You'd be a fool if you thought otherwise. But in the case of the dnc e-mails that were released at the end of the clinton presidential campaign the Russians are simply convenient scapegoats.
Amid all of the hoopla surrounding the incoming Trump administration was a little reported much ignored event involving the IT staff of numerous democrats on the Hill. It appears that three brothers had not only been embezzling money from the Government via their billing process, they had also established outside storage for the information that they were handling. Both highly illegal, prosecutable offenses.
So where is the media coverage? Where is the uproar?
The release of the shultz e-mails occurred at a time when clinton was expected to win the Presidential election going away. clinton was going to trounce Trump and no scandal would change that. Everyone believed it to be true, all the polls showed it to be true. And with clinton's illegal activities during her time in the State Department only a dot in the rearview mirror there would be nothing to stop her.
The release of the schultz e-mails did exactly what it was intended to do. Get schultz to resign.
The whole thing was nothing more than a power play by obama to garner control over the dnc at a time when he saw his influence slipping away. And he did it the way he always has- in a a subversive, illegal manner.
The fact that the brothers three are tied to the muslim brotherhood cannot be ignored. The fact that they were overpaid for their duties cannot be ignored. The fact that they were quietly let go, with no fanfare, cannot be ignored. The fact that they are the ones who had unfettered access to not only all of the accounts in question, but classified information as well, cannot be ignored.
But where does all of this lead?
With the allegiance of the dnc leadership in question and obama's destructive "legacy" at stake, obama needed to put someone who is loyal to him in place. Enter the bernie sanders supported keith ellison and former obama secretary of labor tom perez. Either of which would align with the obama agenda and maintain the direction of the party towards a more "progressive" i.e. socialist position. obama's vision of a muslim based progressive state needed to be secure.
The slime mould that is the obama administration has oozed deep into every facet of government, looking to subvert the Constitution at every opportunity. It is apparent that the dnc is as much a target.
Amid all of the hoopla surrounding the incoming Trump administration was a little reported much ignored event involving the IT staff of numerous democrats on the Hill. It appears that three brothers had not only been embezzling money from the Government via their billing process, they had also established outside storage for the information that they were handling. Both highly illegal, prosecutable offenses.
So where is the media coverage? Where is the uproar?
The release of the shultz e-mails occurred at a time when clinton was expected to win the Presidential election going away. clinton was going to trounce Trump and no scandal would change that. Everyone believed it to be true, all the polls showed it to be true. And with clinton's illegal activities during her time in the State Department only a dot in the rearview mirror there would be nothing to stop her.
The release of the schultz e-mails did exactly what it was intended to do. Get schultz to resign.
The whole thing was nothing more than a power play by obama to garner control over the dnc at a time when he saw his influence slipping away. And he did it the way he always has- in a a subversive, illegal manner.
The fact that the brothers three are tied to the muslim brotherhood cannot be ignored. The fact that they were overpaid for their duties cannot be ignored. The fact that they were quietly let go, with no fanfare, cannot be ignored. The fact that they are the ones who had unfettered access to not only all of the accounts in question, but classified information as well, cannot be ignored.
But where does all of this lead?
With the allegiance of the dnc leadership in question and obama's destructive "legacy" at stake, obama needed to put someone who is loyal to him in place. Enter the bernie sanders supported keith ellison and former obama secretary of labor tom perez. Either of which would align with the obama agenda and maintain the direction of the party towards a more "progressive" i.e. socialist position. obama's vision of a muslim based progressive state needed to be secure.
The slime mould that is the obama administration has oozed deep into every facet of government, looking to subvert the Constitution at every opportunity. It is apparent that the dnc is as much a target.
RSS Feed
