I need to preface this by stating that I believe it is our duty to be responsible caretakers of our environment.
With that comes the responsibility to think our actions through and base them on sound science.
The constant wave of misrepresented fact and pure fallacy that comes from those groups with a vested interest in holding the people of the world hostage in the name of climate change, once called 'global warming,' seems unending.
Within our borders we have seen an attack on the incandescent light bulb in preference of the cfl bulb. The government actually stepped in to ban the aforementioned bulb to rely strictly on the cfl. No forethought as to disposal, or exposure. The forced evolution may appear to be beneficial on the surface, but it is only the increased expansion of the led bulb that prevented this knee jerk reaction by the government from being more of a disaster.
We have also seen an attack on the process called fracking. When studies have proven otherwise, the big money behind foreign oil still produces media campaigns trying to thwart this process. Follow the money to see who is behind such productions as Promised Land.
Along came the ethanol mandate. Another knee jerk reaction by the government in the face of pressure by the left, creating the opposite effect of what they intended to do.
Of course, much like the constant use of "racism" by some, there are those who are making quite a bit of money stirring the pot on climate change.
Government sponsored studies, done with pre-determined outcomes and flawed science and manipulated data, are constantly used to support theories that humankind is solely responsible for mother natures wrath.
Do we pollute? Yes. Do we need to be better caretakers? Yes. Can we control the weather? No.
Not yet anyway. Yet the catechism of those who worship at the climate change alter have faith that it is exactly what we can do.
So they blame humanity for being the tempest, even though our knowledge of the weather and climate patterns over the course of world history disproves that theory.
Thus we have the government funneling even more money through the coffers of industry in order to appear "eco-friendly" while receiving kickbacks in the form of campaign contributions and private contracts.
As their hypocritical nature rises to the surface there are still those who charge forward, blindly, spinning dizzily, because as they like to say when it comes to other religions- faith is not science.
With that comes the responsibility to think our actions through and base them on sound science.
The constant wave of misrepresented fact and pure fallacy that comes from those groups with a vested interest in holding the people of the world hostage in the name of climate change, once called 'global warming,' seems unending.
Within our borders we have seen an attack on the incandescent light bulb in preference of the cfl bulb. The government actually stepped in to ban the aforementioned bulb to rely strictly on the cfl. No forethought as to disposal, or exposure. The forced evolution may appear to be beneficial on the surface, but it is only the increased expansion of the led bulb that prevented this knee jerk reaction by the government from being more of a disaster.
We have also seen an attack on the process called fracking. When studies have proven otherwise, the big money behind foreign oil still produces media campaigns trying to thwart this process. Follow the money to see who is behind such productions as Promised Land.
Along came the ethanol mandate. Another knee jerk reaction by the government in the face of pressure by the left, creating the opposite effect of what they intended to do.
Of course, much like the constant use of "racism" by some, there are those who are making quite a bit of money stirring the pot on climate change.
Government sponsored studies, done with pre-determined outcomes and flawed science and manipulated data, are constantly used to support theories that humankind is solely responsible for mother natures wrath.
Do we pollute? Yes. Do we need to be better caretakers? Yes. Can we control the weather? No.
Not yet anyway. Yet the catechism of those who worship at the climate change alter have faith that it is exactly what we can do.
So they blame humanity for being the tempest, even though our knowledge of the weather and climate patterns over the course of world history disproves that theory.
Thus we have the government funneling even more money through the coffers of industry in order to appear "eco-friendly" while receiving kickbacks in the form of campaign contributions and private contracts.
As their hypocritical nature rises to the surface there are still those who charge forward, blindly, spinning dizzily, because as they like to say when it comes to other religions- faith is not science.
RSS Feed