It wasn't the fact that it was misrepresented by the headline or that the body of the article was written to incite the ire of its readers with slanted misleading prose. I've come to expect those things from the huffy post.
It was the laughable comments by the willfully ignorant, and yes sometimes just plain stupid, readers.
I am going to respond here because I was banned from making comments on the website after comparing obama's socialist agenda to that of a drug dealer who gives away their wares until everyone is hooked and then calls in the tab. That analogy was considered over the top and incendiary.
Here is the link to the attack on, again, Walmart.
A tax subsidy is in no way the same as a tax break. A subsidy, like obama gave to GM and Solyndra and numerous obamacare scammers, is actual money from the taxpayers pocket. Money that will never be repaid.
A tax break is something written into the tax code BY THE GOVERNMENT. That is money that is not GIVEN to the government.
But hey, Walmart is a huge corporation, they don't deserve to be allowed to follow the law. They should willfully give extra to the government so that the government can give more money to the people so the people don't have to work and become productive members of society.
So my moronic liberal lunatics, this is what it is like: There is an interstate highway where the speed limit is 65 mph. You think that it is too fast for a highway so you go and protest saying that anyone who is driving 65 mph should get a speeding ticket. Do you see how the argument is just plain stupid?
Rather than protesting Walmart you idiots should be protesting the IRS for writing these breaks into the tax code. Of course that would mean that you disagree with obama's position on the taxing of large corporations. What a conundrum. Faced with the reality of who's to blame, it's not the corp, it's not Wall Street, IT IS obama. gasp.
Speaking of obama:
Because of his loathing of the Constitution and democratic process,
because of his sympathetic actions towards our enemies,
because of his destructive ideology,
because of his dismantling of the US economy,
because of his disregard of law,
because of his disdain for those with different beliefs,
because of his consistent creation of battles of class, gender, religion and race,
because none of his actions have made the world cleaner, more unified or safer,
obama hasn't added up to much, has he.
This latest action to obtain the release of a deserter, a traitor, is not only a slap in the face of our military it is a slap in the face of every country that has been a target of terrorism.
burgdahl should expect nothing better than to occupy the cell of one of those released at gitmo.
The word of the US means nothing under obama's watch and any resulting acts of terror linked to the five released war criminals lands squarely on obama. obama will be liable for any activities wether he wants to admit responsibility or not.
The world is less safe because of obama's callous, politically driven actions.
Maybe it is time Congress turns off the money spigot and shuts down the government of obama, by obama, for obama.